Only 5 guilds managed to kill Muru in the pre-nerf state. Pieces would later go on to claim the world first of the entire raid tier, putting the guild firmly on the map as one of the game’s top guilds. The fight was eventually killed by European guild Pieces after 731 attempts, claiming their first world 1st in the process. On top of that, the fight was particularly long, and you needed basically everyone alive at the end to even kill the boss. The boss was just very tactically complex. The fight caused guilds issues even in Heroic, my own guild getting stuck on it for some time.
The most recent boss on this list, Uu’nat, was the first boss in the BFA mini-raid Crucible of Storms. For now, C’thun holds enough of a place in WoW folklore as “the hardest boss in Vanilla” so for that alone it deserves to be on this list.
I’ll will make special mention of Naxxramas in a future list. The average player is better now, and the bosses are better tested and patched faster. C’thun is the only Classic boss we’ll include here, because unfortunately, Classic has shown that WoW back in the day just wasn’t as hard as we remember.
Wow mythic raid monitor code#
However, as some players have pointed out, private WoW servers are simply not a reliable source due to them not always getting the code spot on.Īs we moved into Classic, C’thun in the post-nerf state hasn’t caused many guilds a lot of problems since his release in August.
As Classic rolled around, people used private server information to dispute the claim. Back in 2006, it was discussed among hardcore players that the fight was actually mathematically impossible, even with everyone alive. monitor wise btw I absolutely love my Acer XB270H Nvidia G-Sync (and Nvidia 3d Vision) s a 27" as you'd guess now you can get for a fair amount less than the $500 I paid for it over a year ago.but the display is absolutely gorgeous.C’thun was literally unkillable in his original form and with the gear available to players pre- Naxxramas raid tier. Trust me if you wanted to run 4k WoW on Ultra the GTX 1080 can more than handle it.a 25 man raid on a very intense fight probably would drag you down to 60 fps, maybe even 50 fps.(4k is intense after all).but I still say you could even raid 4k with a 1080īut I digress. every game I play is on highest / ultra settings.BF4, Doom (2016 doom), Star Wares: ToR, D3, SCII, XCOM 2.I'm not used to seeing below 60 fps very often at all if ever in some games.and all these stats are just with a single GTX 980.a GTX 1080 is literally 200% more powerful. I can run wow at 2k very smoothly as well if I want and I'll still belt over 70 fps easy - still in Directx 11 Ultra the whole time of course). more powerful than a Titan X or TWO GTX 980 combined.I have the GTX 980 btw, I can vouch on experience they are beasts in their own right (I can get 105 fps at ultra in WoW, it drops to 80 fps in raids - not that I do much of that anymore, in certain spots of raids with high action I've seen it dip to 60 fps but not much below that and certainly not for any long amount of time - granted this is at 1080 p / 144 hz.
I'll follow that up with its apparent some people on here aren't really as geeky into tech - I don't think they understand the power of the GTX 1080. First let me wipe my drool of nerd envy away from your GTX 1080 One of these days I will have one oh yes I will have one!.
0 kommentar(er)
